I wholly understand that it will take a politician with big balls to announce a policy that prevents some mentally ill Britons - some of the most at risk people in our society - from having the right to use the Internet. There will be significant uproar from people who won't believe that an internet-related narcissistic personality disorder merits such a cruel deprivation of human rights.

Still, I suggest to you now that the time has come for Glen's Law. A law designed to stop people like Jenvey, who are not in control of their actions or self-hatred, abusing people online.

I say write to your MP and to mental illness charities everywhere and get Glen's Law put into place. With a wide umbrella of support Narcissistic Personality disorder will be recognised and victims of it assisted by virtual disconnections. Without such legislation the Internet will be much worse-off than it is. Those who claim to be the Internet's pioneers should understand this. The Internet may well be the equivalent of the Wild West and it should always be a temple to freedom - but even the Wild West had a way of dealing with its most antisocial inhabitants. 

Having said all that, there is another angle to Jenvey's postings which can't be ignored. For Glen Jenvey's rants occasionally illuminate. Every now and again they spill the beans.

Sometimes the stuff that he lets splurge from his keyboard - like the unstoppable vomit of a teenager drunk on a cocktail of cherry brandy and crème de menthe - lets the cat right out of the bag. Most of the stuff Jenvey writes is offensive to me but once in a blue moon he erroneously gives me a wonderful gift as he throws his mud at me and lets his heart and afflictions control his head.

On Friday night last week Jenvey posted a shocking rant on the extremist Islamist website Ummah.com having a go at the police, Zionists, me, most bloggers and the rest of the planet. It included some interesting emails.

As Omar Hamza, Jenvey revealed in a few messy posts how his former sidekick, Michael Starkey, the part-time De Montfort University lecturer, is still at his side (and presumably never left his side all along, although a certain blogger claimed the opposite a couple of weeks ago on his blog). How the two of them are now working alongside people I used to collaborate with to "get me". There it was in broad daylight for me to see - their line of attack; their Wightman silencing strategy!

This emotional bulimia which Jenvey allowed manifest itself in his Friday night posts was spotted by Starkey and the blogger Tim Ireland the next day. Ireland then clearly gave his Islamist buddy Sajid Pandore, the Ummah.com moderator, an urgent heads-up about this as it was quickly removed.

The emails Jenvey posted included email addresses and a telephone number - all of which I have verifiable record of. Pandore removed the posts on Saturday but too late not to be read by their apparent enemy - they were saved for me in an MHT file that Saturday morning by a colleague. The emails included (either as sender or recipient) Pandore, Starkey, Jenvey, Omar Bakri, Tim Ireland of the site Bloggerheads and Richard Bartholomew of the Pooter blog Bartholomew's notes on religion.

So what are these people aiming at to - as they like to put it - "neutralize" me? (To be fair most of this crowd have sensibly given up, although Starkey and Jenvey live for the day of my destruction.)

Top of their list is a BBC TV programme, Newsnight, an episode of which was aired back in November 2006 in which I played a five second part. Jenvey's claim is that I paid "some guy a handful of cash" to pretend he had infiltrated the Islamist extremist sect Hizb ut Tahrir al Islami (HT). That I bought the BBC. Jenvey claims that Newsnight were co-conspirators and gladly let my hired hand go on the show and relate a detailed account about how HT were allowing street gangs operate in South London whilst pretending to be a mole. He claims that I am working for the police and a group of Tories set out to destabilise Britain and demonise Muslims.

Of course this claim is laughable (the police/Tory/demonising part is of course another of Jenvey's own odd castles in the air). Hizb ut Tahrir al Islami are a scurrilous totalitarian extreme Islamist sect with a history of producing suicide bombers and violent preachers (Jenvey's new boss Omar Bakri, the obese jihadi ranter, used to run them). In the other corner, Newsnight are about the most respected investigative team in British broadcasting. They know a true mole when they see one. The people involved in the making of that film are the best and most professional you can find on the planet. They cross-reference, double-check, triple-check and Jenvey knows this all too well. (After all he was also involved in the same film, talking to camera about how Bakri was exhorting people to bomb Dublin airport and turn Britain Islamist black by any means, including violence.)  

When the film was aired, Hizb ut Tahrir were so badly rumbled they could think of nothing more intelligent than to organise a systematic complaints campaign against the BBC, knowing that the BBC charter would ensure there was an independent complaints procedure taken up by the broadcast regulator OFCOM.

And of course, OFCOM received hundreds of complaints, mostly from people called Mr or Mrs Khan. These were reduced to about thirty (many exactly the same complaint reprinted). When OFCOM did its further investigation into these thirty complaints, all of Hizb ut Tahrir's complaints were dismissed. Every single one of them. The only area of the whole eleven minute film that the BBC were told was not relevant to the film was a ten second section added onto the end of the film independently by one of the film editors - it was a section unconnected to Hizb ut Tahrir. The BBC were praised for their thoroughness of investigation. Again the BBC handled a sensitive subject matter with a deft touch.

The first that Jenvey and Starkey knew about the HT element to the Newsnight programme was when it was aired. They seemed hurt that I told them nothing about it. They never understood that there are risks involved with putting someone inside an extremist group. The less people that knew about it while it was happening the better. They've never forgiven me for this "betrayal" when they know damn well that I would have been betraying the insider if I'd let them know of his existence before emission. They thought they were invaluable to me but time has proven them wrong. I've continued to hit the Islamist enemy hard. They have sold a few stories. The rest - Sun stories and switching sides - is now inescapable history.

So what is next on Starkey's and Jenvey's smear list designed to destroy me? Faking 7/7 or the airline bomb plot perhaps? Planting a load of child porn videos in one of my outhouses? No. This pair's scraping the barrel is excruciating. Amongst other things, it's the aforementioned 2009 Madonna fake story!

Even though the whole world knows Jenvey posted this story, or got someone else to post this story (it has his clumsy paw prints all over it) now they are trying to pin this one on me. But I don't even work with tabloids. I never have. Since the invention of the conical bra there's nothing I'd do to upset Madonna. In any case I was handily tucked away at a family finca in South America at the time when dodgy posts were posted. The finca has no Internet and there's no Internet access for forty miles. The story is obviously nothing to do with me. Even the blogger Bartholomew admits this in a recent post on his site. And so, "Kaplunk". Another smear attempting to down me bites the dust.