Next?

Also on the shopping list of smears thrown up by careless "Sheikh" Jenvey (the term used by sycophant Starkey to name Jenvey over the last few years) are "Islamophobe", "thug links", "fakery", "working for the Uzbeks", "working for various other agencies" and then a load of personal smears (which no doubt they'll have to resort to now as they've rather run out of other material haven't they?!). Most of these smears have already been used by the Islamist-Leftist compact against me and no-one has paid them any attention. Nonetheless they are worth addressing here once and for all:

One of the nastiest personal smears that has been passed to me through the ether by an informant in the leftist /Islamist/ nutzoid plot against me is that I'm the father of a former Miss World's child - again fictitious (presumably designed to upset my wife) because i) prophylactics and ii) my relationship with the former Miss World finished in 2003 (her only child was born in 2006). But gutter nasty - this lot really mean me and my family harm!

There's another personal smear doing the rounds involving me and a four legged mammal. Again - "Kaplunk". Not my cup of tea.

So, in anticipation of a load of these planned fabrications and new smears coming my way over coming days, weeks and months - and to hopefully put something of a sock in this tedious "smear war" of theirs (most of which I'm glad to say the leftie bloggers have not touched with a bargepole for weeks) - let me be crystal clear and state once and for all here some smear-destroying facts:

1. I have never worked with any tabloid newspaper. Never placed a story with a tabloid newspaper.
2. I have never been paid by a newspaper for a story.
3. I have never worked with a news agency, or run my own.
4. I have never faked a story for any type of media.
5. I have never worked with "thugs" or joined a group of "thugs". (This suggestion is the most laughable of the lot).
6. I'm not a member of the EDL or SIOE or any other extremist anti Islamist groups. I've made clear publicly I don't agree with them or their strategies.
7. I would not be seen anywhere near the BNP let alone become a member of the BNP.
8. I'm a centre-right, Tory voting Brit.
9. I am no Islamophobe. If I felt insecure about this particular smear I would reach for my nearest Muslim friend and get them to write about how nice I have been to them. Can't be bothered. Not worth more than this response. Those who know me know I have no issue with Muslims - my passion is exposing those who try to slight Muslims by pretending to be them (the Al Muhajirouns and other extremist Islamists, who are less respectful of Islam than me).
10. I am not associated with Glen Jenvey or his discredited, meddling sidekick Michael Starkey. All the work I ever did with Glen Jenvey was audio or video based. It was a long time ago. It was triple-checked and we did not have the resources back then to fake the audio and video evidence we collected anyway. (No-one has ever suggested it was faked by the way but right now Jenvey will say anything).

The questions the lefties should be asking are not which stories were faked by me (as there are none).  Or which stories were faked by Jenvey (that's tiresome history and they're easy to spot).

What the far lefties should do - if they want to make themselves useful (am I being too idealistic, here?) - is to ask why is Michael Starkey claiming not to be associated with Jenvey when as little as nine days ago he has been shown to be sending emails to Jenvey, and alongside Jenvey, to the blogger Tim Ireland? (By the way, enjoy these two Tim. I survived a whole year of them. Can you imagine?! "Like shit on the shoe" a politician friend used to call them, for they are really difficult to shift.)

The lefties should be asking, alongside their extremist Islamist friends like Pandore, is Jenvey's conversion real? If so, why is Jenvey still in cahoots with Starkey? And why is Jenvey so obviously, in my opinion, still having a whisky in the evening? They should also be asking why Starkey is associating himself and colluding with a vulnerable adult who has recently admitted to disrupting social cohesion in Britain for cash. Just how can someone like Starkey in a position of responsibility at a university with a large Muslim studentship maintain his role there? 

Or of course the lefties could focus on another more interesting story altogether like the rise of the BNP.

Was Starkey ever paid, either directly or indirectly, by any news agency for the placement of a fake story to a tabloid newspaper (Jenvey used to use one called Ferrari before Sellyourstory was conceived)? Why is Starkey lying now about his association with Jenvey - is it to distract attention away from the Madonna story which he perhaps (it is merely my opinion) received a few quid for, or is it to make Jenvey's conversion seem more real? Whose idea was it to set up Sellyourstory - perhaps a hard-up, part-time marketing lecturer's or a vulnerable adult's? (Find the answers to these questions and you are doing a public service. My personal belief is that Jenvey is bright enough to fake a story all on his own but that he needed help to cash in on it. That's where I'd be looking now to extinguish any further embers of fakery.)

Now that the world knows Jenvey is ill he should be handled with kid gloves but cut off from the Internet until he gets better. A lot of people don't seem to know this and they should realise this now. Right now the Internet is something Glen Jenvey could do without. "Glen's Law" should be rushed in to stop people like him from self-destructing further online. People like him should not be allowed anywhere near a computer keyboard especially after admitting to such serious online crime.

It would be good if the 2006 Glen Jenvey reappeared one day and once more saw the light. With his new found friends, such a marvel seems improbable though never impossible.

Good luck, Glen. If one day you wake up in fright at the state of the skunk growing on your chin and realise that actually Al Muhajiroun are a bunch of sad, warped losers, contact me for a beer. Let's sit down, talk about how you can get back to doing what you did best. How we can end the drama surrounding you and get back to collecting undeniable facts, quietly and responsibly. If ever you feel ready to do this, Glen - to bury Omar -contact a go-between, send the beard in a jiffy bag to Bakri in Lebanon and state clearly that you are ready to rejoin the Light.

Dominic Wightman is the Editor of the Westminster Journal.

---

Bookmark with: