Since the Cheerleaders have publicly been making the blogger Tim Ireland’s life even more of a misery and winding up his sidekick, the Reverend Richard Bartholomew, many have been asking who exactly is involved with their crowd? Are they really thugs? If so, where’s the incident sheet? What’s their relationship with violence? Are they likely to go round to Ireland’s house and beat him up with pom-poms? Is there a chance they will make bespectacled stirrer, Richard Bartholomew, suffer torture by twirling stick?

I have publicly condemned the Cheerleaders’ tweet threats to Ireland and others. I’ve publicly chided them for their antisocial antics before - hacking and sending saucy images to my mobile phone which the wife might find and use to accuse me of intellectual adultery.

I suppose I too have wondered who these Cheerleaders are, though I’ve never felt threatened by them; more intrigued by how they came to be. Being threatened by a cheerleader hardly seems comparable to being threatened by saber-wielding nutters with long beards in pyjamas with trousers cut off as if they’re permanently expecting a flood. Neither worth losing any sleep over by the way.  

There’s not a lot online about the Cheerleaders. I suppose I’ve felt some duty to search them out and expose them, though Ireland’s whining has hardly made me focus a full time investigation on them (not exactly my kind of damsel in distress). I don’t know anyone on the ground who knows their numbers or where they live and work. It’s far easier working out who the key cadres are in the LTTE in London or who’s who in Al Muhajiroun’s pecking order than working out who the Cheerleaders are.  

I have had a live email address for the Cheerleaders for some time (also a mobile number which seems to have gone dead). One of their “choreographers” called Princess Calamity sent me some info-dumps on MPAC’s Chief Dweeb Asghar Bukhari and a few other Islamist whelks some months back by email. A fortnight ago I sent the following questions to the live email address (which is for Princess Calamity) but nothing came back. I presumed they didn’t need the extra exposure what with Ireland allegedly calling the police on them.

Presumably Ireland and Bartholomew also sent them some questions, as I’d made the email address I had for the Cheerleaders public. Or maybe they were too scared. Ireland’s new colleagues Glen Jenvey and his still-associated sidekick, the part-time marketing lecturer Michael Starkey might have sent the Cheerleaders some questions too but they might have been too busy covering up past tracks, erasing all record of their dodgy story agency (great marketing idea that turned out to be!), while busily making Jenvey’s conversion look more real than it is for Operation Redemption.

After a marvellous day of enemy errors on Saturday, out of the blue on Sunday some answers from Princess Calamity finally arrived - an A4 sheet duct-taped to the door of a house I use suddenly appeared. On the sheet were the following answers to my questions and a video link, stapled to a message which read:

“Finished chatting to the girls about your questions, here’s the answers. The doc also contains the video trailer they've done, and they said it's most important that you don't tamper with the questions and that you get the Youtube clip into the post. If you can post that tonight, that's brilliant. Thankyoo. Princess Calamity xxx”

I have not seen this document in person - I was not at that house at the time. On the doorstep the Cheerleaders also left a book by Dr Christopher Green entitled “Toddler Taming”. (I think I get the Cheerleaders’ drift).

I’ve not tampered with the Cheerleaders’ answers or my original questions (that’s the kind of thing my left-wing and Islamist opponents do). I thought about not publishing the contents of their document at all but decided that it’s in the public interest (all ten of you who are interested) to do so. After all I asked the questions in the first place not for myself but for those asking.

So here are the Cheerleaders’ answers and my original questions as given (be warned, some of the answers require post-watershed viewing):